Personal Injury Attorney's Blog

RSS Get Personal Injury RSS Feeds

Supreme Judicial Court Rules That Successor Lenders Are Not Shielded From Liability For The Original Lender’s Misconduct

Joseph Coupal - Saturday, August 24, 2013
Recently, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court  overturned a Superior Court decision that will change the way Massachusetts courts analyze liability of  successor lenders and assignees on consumer home loans.  In Drakopoulos v. U.S. Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 465 Mass. 775 (2013), residential borrowers defaulted on a mortgage that required monthly payments that exceeded their monthly income by $600.00.  The borrowers had been unaware that their income was inflated on their loan application (for a 10.315% stated-income loan), and they weren’t required to demonstrate how they could make payments that were 150% of their monthly income.  Following the default, the loan and mortgage were assigned to another lender for collection.  The second lender then foreclosed on the mortgage.     The borrowers raised the original lender’s predatory lending practices as a defense to the foreclosure action, claiming violations of the Consumer Protection Act, the Predatory Home Loan Practices Act, and the Borrower’s Interest Act. The Superior Court granted summary judgment on behalf of the foreclosing lender, ruling that the original lender’s conduct could not be attributed to the successor lender.  On appeal, however, the Supreme Judicial Court found that if the acts of the original lender were unconscionable, then the original mortgage was unenforceable.  Applying  common law principles of assignee liability to the contractual defense of unconscionability, the SJC  concluded that if a mortgage is unenforceable for this reason, then the mortgage does not  become enforceable by assigning it  to a third party.  This consumer-friendly decision reaffirms the fact that lenders may not shield themselves from liability simply because they are not the original party to a contract.   Successor lenders have an incentive to insure that the laws have been followed when the original transaction took place, or else they could be left unable to enforce mortgages that they received by assignment if the original lender engaged in unconscionable behavior.     If you are buying a home and need a mortgage, let the experienced lawyers at Brooks & Crowley, LLP help you navigate through the process.  

Contributed by Laura Martin

[view google map]

Brooks & Crowley LLP serves clients throughout Massachusetts, and has offices in Dedham, Boston and Norwell

Main Office:

Brooks & Crowley LLP.
439 Washington Street,
Dedham, MA 02026

Tel. 781-277-7321 | Fax 800-625-9021

Boston Office:

Brooks & Crowley LLP
112 Water Street
Boston, MA 02109

Tel. 781-277-7321 | Fax 800-625-9021

Norwell Office:

Brooks & Crowley LLP
320 Washington Street
Norwell, MA 02061

Tel. 781-277-7321 | Fax 800-625-9021


© Copyright 2020 Brooks and Crowley | All rights reserved. | Sitemap | Legal | Contact |

Web/Marketing created and maintained by WSI PRO Marketing.